Interim 1
I’m not sure why but I didn’t participate in interim 1’s peer review UAL session, so I didn’t receive any feedback from my peers. Instead, I’ve included a screenshot of the grades I was given by Caz alongside some action plan bullet points. With the first unit of the academic year, I decided to do my best in not giving too many fucks, but I did absolutely adjust my work to better suit the suggestions that were given to me. For example, after receiving this generous review, I made sure to go back to add more visual examples of what I discussed in my written work, including YouTube videos and collages.
Interim 2
Interim 2 was a little bit chaotic because I struggled to stick with just 1 concept. My blog was filled with dozens of ideas that had their own sketches and briefs. This terrible system meant my tasks were extremely unorganised and difficult to comprehend as a whole, resulting in the referrals displayed above. After narrowing down what I wanted to create, and removing everything that was unrelated to my final idea, the work quickly became a ‘D’ or ‘E’ overall. In addition, I always went back to the early development stages to implement new ideas generation processes, such as colour experiments and blockouts for different asset variations.
Interim 3
The final interim consists of both task 4 and 5 work, including final presentation of 3D assets; a reflective development log; all peer reviews inserted and annotated appropriately; and finally, the unit’s final evaluation. As of the aforementioned date, my dev. log was complete (bar some minor adjustments), peer reviews being written (paradox here), and final evaluation bare. In my action plan, I state that I’ll edit the development log to better suit Nathan’s suggestion and begin the final evaluation.
Level 3 Year 2 